Ors Versus Crown Colony Government

In order to come to a conclusive response to the question of whether the nineteenth century debate over steer Colony organisation versus the Old example System as a weapon of compound rule in the nineteenth century British West Indies was and emergence of democracy versus autocracy. I shall in that respectfore assort between democracy and autocracy, and Old deterrent example System and the poll Colony political relation activity respectively.Moreover, I am going to show from democratic standpoint that the Old good example system and the pinch Colony Government argon different as it relates to the head of democracy that was allowed within the cardinal types of Governance. Trevor Monroe asserts that the denomination democracy comes from the bringing in concert of devil Greek words, demos, which means people, and kratia, which means to rule. Monroe save asserts that in democratic states political rights are recognized and practiced to roughly peak (Munroe, 2002).Th erefore, it is safe to say that autocracy is the black eye of democracy in that it is based on ego derived proponent or in other words absolute license and supremacy of an individual or group. Moreover, Monroe affirms that in authoritarian states there is no equating in the rule of the law, he goes on to mention that the laws within these states are for some but the rulers are above the law. The close critical point Monroe puts forward is that the rules that hold out under an authoritarian system are influenced by the desires of the ruling group and may change from time to time(Monroe. 2002).Understanding these two terminologies will provide a clearer reasonableness to the reader as it relates to the Old vocalisation System and the Crown Colony Government. From the rise of slavery in the Caribbean to the time of the Crown Colony Government, the ideology of the powers that be (plantocracy or elite) was to maintain absolute power and work over the people who were considere d of a get off class (Slaves). To get a crack grasp of the architecture of the Old interpretive program System and its functions I shall therefore steering on the writings of Edward long and Brian Edwards. desire and Edwards affirms that the Old Representative system was the rife constitutional mastermind in the British colonies in the West Indies during the seventeenth and 18th centuries. farsighted and Edwards go on upgrade to state that as a governmental system, the ORS consisted of three basic elements in the form or regulator, Council, and Assembly. The governor as the authors explain was the chief executive and was appointive by the Crown and was the local substitute of imperial interest in the dependence (Long and Edward. 004).The council, the authors assert was appointed by the Crown on the recommendation of the Governor, functioned as a second chamber of the colonial law-makers and also as an advisory council to the Governor who exercised, under the universal supervision of the crown, common powers of suspension and dismissal over its members. establish on the information being presented by the authors it can clearly be seen that there was some form of contain democracy.Long and Edwards affirms that in some colonies, the council acting unneurotic with the Governor, also exercised judicial functions as an appellate court in cases involving sums in tautologic of three hundred pounds but non exceeding five hundred pounds, in which case appeals lay to the crowns privy council. Lastly, long and Edwards asserts that the assemblies varied in size and were elected by freeholders on a franchise which in it self varied among different colonies.The authors articulate that the constitutional form together with the respective powers and functions of the constituent elements of the ORS were laid tweak in the commission and instructions issued to the Governor by the Crown under the berth of the royal prerogative (Long and Edward. 2004). Long a nd Edward provides severalise to support the fact that there was limited democracy with the ORS. They stated that within the boilers suit framework of the ORS, it was clearly intended that the play should be subordinate to the Governor and Council.The general subordination of the assembly was secured by the power of the Governor to refuse assent legislative power with the assembly, including the right to amend property bills passed by the Assembly. According to Long and Edward however, in spite of these restrictions, the Assembly through the effective use of its power over supplies, acquired immense power and became the dominant element of the colonial constitutional structure, in the face of inflexible attempts on the part of the imperial government to limit its legislative competence and to put in its power within the legal saltation of a provincial council.